APP - Assessment outcomes and APP
The criteria from level 3+ are taken from the national strategies. There are no official criteria for levels 1 and 2 but for the sake of completeness we have included what would be reasonably logical extensions using National Curriculum attainment target criteria. This enables us to map equivalences from the Qualifications and Credit Framework to the National Curriculum providing some confidence that the qualifications are compatible not only with the National Occupational Standards, but also the NC programmes of study and the assessment systems most likely to be employed. In any assessment strategy the criteria provide a means of bench marking performance through a programme of study. There is more detail about that at the link above. In the National Curriculum the programmes of study are to an extent age related and so to meet statutory requirements learners in a particular key stage should cover the programme of study and have their assessed levels recorded on sufficient occasions to be confident about their capability. There is no statutory requirement to adopt any particular assessment methods although in KS3 the National Strategy is to use the APP methods developed by QCDA in consultation with schools and the National Strategies. In the absence of any other national assessment scheme it seems reasonable to adopt similar methods in other aspects of assessment to standardise methods as far as possible.
TLM qualifications are designed to be age independent. If the learner can provide appropriate evidence of meeting the assessment criteria they will be awarded credit. Meeting the assessment requirements is the only condition for the award of credit and that is a principle of the Qualifications and Credit Framework and is consistent with a Personalised Learning Agenda. Linkage to the NC and APP criteria simply provides evidence for the potential compatibility between the assessment systems. It's up to individual teachers to decide on suitable learning contexts in which to implement the assessment. Mapping of activities against the programmes of study also demonstrates that there is no reason why the programmes of study cannot be covered at the same time as achieving QCF credit. This is important for funding in the 14-19 age range under section 96 of the education act.
The criteria in this table have HTML anchors associated with them. This means we can make links directly from the assessor guidance to interpreting the ITQ assessment criteria directly to individual NC criteria. For example, http://theingots.org/community/Bronze1#16 (I appreciate the need for planning) is linked by the text in the assesssors' guide to http://theingots.org/community/APPcriteria#AF1.1.1 All the APP criteria are linked to the ITQ assessment criteria in this way accompanied by the assessor guidance. QCDA Assessing Pupil Progress is a method and these criteria need to take those methods into account. The criteria for NC levels 1 and 2 are logical extensions using the National Curriculum criteria but are not part of the criteria provided in the KS3 national strategy, they are there to aid transparency in the mapping of the NC to the ITQ assessment models. If you want to copy the HTML here to integrate into your own information systems, you might want to check with the copyright owner (Crown). The text in the table for Levels 3 to 8 is taken from a document subject to Crown Copyright and is reproduced here under the terms of Crown Copyright Policy Guidance issued by HMSO to promote APP methods. The advantage of using the HTML here is that there are anchors at each statment that are not in the original to enable more precise linking of information to each statement facilitating cross-referencing. Otherwise we could have just made a link to the original APP document. More details about the APP system is here.
Assessment outcome criteria for levels 1-8 in the NC